Yaya MobX reactivity state model ya bambanta da Redux?

Question

Accepted Answer

**MobX** yana ɗauki karkatar da ke banbanta sosai daga Redux: maimakon ayyukan bayyane-bayyane da babbar sauyi na rashin ɓacewa, yana amfani da **clearness reactivity** — kana baddada observable state kai tsaye, kuma MobX ke bibiyar-bibiyar carcar abincinka ba sauri ba, kuma kuna sabunta abin da ya dunƙule ta shi (kamar Vue reactivity ko Signals). ## MobX — abubuwan da ake iya badada, bincike na atomatik ```js import { makeAutoObservable } from "mobx"; import { observer } from "mobx-react-lite"; class CounterStore { count = 0; constructor() { makeAutoObservable(this); } // make fields observable increment() { this.count++; } // ✅ DIRECT mutation — no actions, no immutability get double() { return this.count * 2; } // computed — auto-derived & cached } const store = new CounterStore(); // observer components auto-re-render when the observables they read change const Counter = observer(() => ( )); ``` Kana baddada state kai tsaye (`this.count++`), kuma MobX ke sabunta kawai `observer` abubuwan da ke karanta `count` kai tsaye. Babu reducers, ayyuka, dispatch, ko baddada hannu na rashin ɓacewa. ## Babbar bambanta na yanayi ```text Redux MobX Updates immutable (return new state) mutable (change in place) Mechanism explicit actions + reducers transparent reactive tracking Data flow strict one-way, predictable automatic dependency reactions Boilerplate more less Derived values selectors (manual) computed (automatic, cached) Mental model functional / explicit OOP / reactive / implicit ``` ## Yaya MobX ke bibiyar carcar ```text MobX wraps observables in proxies. When an observer component renders, MobX records which observables it READ. When any of those change, MobX re-runs exactly that component — fine-grained, automatic, no selectors needed. ``` Din ne m gida-kan-karatun/ƙalbaltar-kan-rubutu irin na Vue reactivity da Signals. ## Kasuwantaka ```text MobX pros: less boilerplate, automatic reactivity, easy derived values, OOP-friendly MobX cons: "magic" can be less explicit/traceable than Redux's logged actions; mutation-based flow is harder to time-travel debug than pure reducers ``` ## Me ya sa haka mahimmanci MobX yana wakiltar **reactive/changeable** kasuwan jiyya-jiyyan state — abin badalawa na Redux **bayyane/rashin ɓacewa** hanya. Sanin bambanta yana fayyace mahimmancin gida ɗin ƙera: bayyane-da-tabbatarwa (Redux: bi kowane aiki, amma ƙarin boilerplate) da automatik-da-gajere (MobX: baddada kyauta, ƙaramin code, amma ƙaramin bayyane). Samun jari daya jari na vue da Signals, sabili haka sanin MobX yana walwale gida-kan-gida na tutocin jiyya-jiyyan state, kuma yana taimaka muku zaɓar tsakanin tabbatarwa da ergonomics domin aikin gida.