Inti kollha ħalaft ma' l-ġestur tiegħek? X'għamilt?

Question

Accepted Answer

Huma jivverifikaw li tista' **tappella b'rispett** u **taqbel u allura tkomment** — esprimi l-opinjoni tiegħek b'raġunament, allura appoġġja d-deċiżjoni finali. Evita ż-żewġ ekstremi: konformità sileńt u disjunzjoni testarda.

## Kif tapprocċjaha

```text
1. Raise the concern privately and early, with data not emotion
2. Frame it around shared goals ("I want this launch to succeed, and I'm worried
   about X")
3. Listen — your manager may have context you lack
4. If overruled, commit fully and follow through
```

## Eżempju ppruvat

```text
S: My manager wanted to ship a feature without a feature flag.
T: I felt the rollout was risky for new code.
A: I shared a one-paragraph risk note and suggested a flag as cheap insurance.
   She explained a deadline constraint I hadn't known.
R: We compromised: flag on the riskiest part only. It caught a bug in prod
   without a full rollback.
```

## Tajjeb kontra dgħajf

```text
✓ Respectful, evidence-based, private
✓ Commits after the decision
✗ Going over their head first
✗ "I just did what I was told" (shows no judgment)
```

## Għaliex dan huwa importanti

Il-ġesturi jridu nies li jaħsbu, mhux biss li jeżekwtu.

L-appellazzjoni raġunata hija feature, mhux problema.

Innaqqaluha b'mod privat u b'data juri li trixxu r-relazzjoni u l-proċess ta' deċiżjoni.

L-impenji wara li tkun ngħelbejt tippruva li int plejer ta' tim, mhux kontrarjan.