Ceritakne marang aku nalika sampeyan memberikno umpan balik sing angel kanggo kanca kerja.

Question

Accepted Answer

Para pewawancara njajaki yen sampeyan bisa **langsung lan apik bebarengan** — spesifik, pribadi, lan fokus ing tlaku, dudu karakter. Bingkai sing migunani yaiku **Situasi-Tlaku-Dampak (SBI)**.

## Carane ndekaké

```text
SBI FRAME
Situation → when/where it happened
Behavior  → the specific, observable action (not a label)
Impact    → the effect it had on the team or work
Then: ask for their view and agree on a change
```

## Conto sing wis ditindakno

```text
S: A teammate's code reviews were so blunt that juniors stopped opening PRs.
T: I wanted reviews to stay rigorous but not scare people off.
A: I spoke with him privately: "In yesterday's review, the comment 'this is
   wrong' (behavior) led the author to avoid posting today (impact)." I asked if
   he'd try phrasing suggestions as questions.
R: His tone softened, PR volume recovered, and code quality stayed high.
```

## Apik vs lemah

```text
✓ Private, specific, behavior-focused
✓ Two-way, not a lecture
✗ Vague ("you're too harsh")
✗ Public call-out or character attack
```

## Sebab penting

Nahanake umpan balik supaya "apik" malah nyakiti wong — ora bisa benerna apa sing ora dirungokno.

Fokus ing tlaku lan dampak nggawe ora kaya serangan pribadi, dadi tiba.

Kemampuan memberikno umpan balik angel kanthi apik yaiku syarat wajib kanggo nongoli tim.