Paano kayo magsusulat ng magandang Product Requirements Document (PRD)?

Question

Accepted Answer

A **Product Requirements Document (PRD)** nerangake *apa* sing bakal kowe bangun, *mengapa*, lan *carane kowe bakal ngerti yen bisa berhasil* — supaya engineering lan design bisa bangun bab sing tepat tanpa penjelasan terus-terusan. A PRD sing apik yaiku kakasin pamikir lan siji artefak alignment, ora mung kertas birokrasi.

## Struktur PRD sing solid

```text
1. PROBLEM / CONTEXT → what problem, for whom, why now
2. GOALS & SUCCESS METRICS → what outcome, how measured
3. NON-GOALS → what this explicitly does NOT cover
4. USER STORIES / REQUIREMENTS → what it must do
5. UX → flows, wireframes, key states
6. EDGE CASES → errors, empty states, limits
7. DEPENDENCIES & RISKS → what could block or break this
8. OPEN QUESTIONS → known unknowns to resolve
```

## Mula saka mengapa

Bagéan sing paling penting yaiku **masalah lan tujuan**. Yen tim ngerti *mengapa* lan *carane kesuksesan mumusuh*, dheweke asring bakal nemokake solusi sing luwih apik tinimbang sing kowe spesifikake. PRD sing mung spesifikasi fitur bae ora bakal sowan saka sisih iki.

## Non-tujuan ora dihargai

Nyatakake kanthi tegas apa sing wis ana ing luar lingkup nglawan creep lingkup lan perangkap "nalika kita lagi..." Iku padha berharga karo persyaratan dhewe-dhewe.

## Pitfalls umum

```text
✗ Over-specifying the HOW → boxes in engineering's better ideas
✗ No success metric → you can't tell if it worked
✗ Writing it alone → involve eng/design early to catch issues
✗ Treating it as fixed → a PRD is a living doc
```

## Mengapa penting

Kebanyakan rework asale saka misalignment: tim bangun apa sing dijalok, ora apa sing perlu.

A PRD sing jelas nampakake gap-gap iki *sadurunge* sapa wae nulis kode.

Tugas juga ngpaksa *sampeyan* kanggo mikir masalah nganti tuntas.

Yen sampeyan ora bisa nulis tujuan lan metrik kesuksesan kanthi jelas, sampeyan ora ngerti masalah cukup apik kanggo bangun iku.